Voters of Sussex. An interesting comment has popped up.

voters of sussex has left a new comment on your post “Establishment Paedophiles exposed, Jimmy Savile is…“:

“Katy Bourne Sussex Police Crime Commissioner under attack over Paedophiles cover up
KATY BOURNE SUSSEX POLICE CRIME COMMISSIONER

WE THE PEOPLE OF SUSSEX HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW IF YOU ARE COVERING UP SUSSEX POLICE CORRUPTION AND FOR PAEDOPHILES

IT HAS BEEN SHOWN THAT SUSSEX POLICE COVERED UP FOR JIMMY SAVILE THE MAIN THING IN THE SAVILLE CASE IS THAT THE MASONS ARE HEAVILY INVOLVED IN THE COVER UP

KATY BOURNE ARE YOU A MASON?

YOU SAID THAT THERE WOULD BE TRANSPARENCY IN YOUR OFFICE

WHEN WILL YOU HOLD A PUBLIC MEETING CONCERNING SUSSEX POLICE CORRUPTION

MAYBE IT SHOULD READ CAMPAIGN TO REMOVE KATY BOURNE

CAMPAIGN TO REMOVE SUSSEX CHIEF CONSTABLE MARTIN RICHARDS

Remove Martin Richards as Chief Constable and ask an outside Police Force to investigate corruption and gross misconduct inside Sussex Police Force

A complaint made against Arun District Council in 2002 that a paedophile ring was operating within the council offices appears to have been interfered with by the Chief Constable who appears to be friends with the ex-Chief Executive of the Council. When the same council then used false documents to bankrupt the author of the statement, Sussex Police failed to take any action. Instead it appears that they actively encouraged the bankruptcy court by writing at very specific hearings denying any ongoing investigation or at the very least minimising their involvement – leaving the defendant in this case looking as though he was either lying or attempting to delay the court proceedings. The judge in the matter eventually lost patience and granted the bankruptcy order. The man’s £500,000 home was then sold for little over half price to the best friend of one of the original investigating officers. He was best man at the friends wedding.

I’m now told that a new investigation into the Police handling of the original complaint is underway and several serving officers are to be investigated for misconduct.

However, this second investigation also now appears to have been delayed by further influences from senior officers. The original investigating officer appears to have completely disappeared from the ranks of Sussex Police and is either suspended or on long term sick leave.”

This is as yet unverified, however, due to the gravity of the situation, we thought that our researchers may want to look into this.

Regards.

The GriffinWatch Team.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Voters of Sussex. An interesting comment has popped up.

  1. Anonymous

    It's under Section 49 of the Police Act that one gets one police force to investigate another police force – under Section 49 the police you have a complaint against, MUST call in an outside police force to investigate them – to make the complaint, you demand the police to give you Section 49 police complaint forms, fill them in, make copies of the completed forms, personally hand the completed forms to a senior police officer and request he writes on all the copies, that he recieved the originals, and get him to sign his signature on each of the copies – you'll be surprised how polite and helpful the police become once you get a Section 49 police investigation going – I know because I instigated a Section 49 police investigation that concluded surprisingly favourably for me.Fly On The Wall

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s