UK Government Uses Digital Communications Data to Spy on Their Citizens

Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post

The UK Home Office (UKHO) has British officials surveying its citizens as part of the government’s annual legislative program.

This is an extensive expansion of the current laws to allow the MI5 data securitization.

UKHO claims they are not snooping through private emails and messages, but rather deciphering where the communications are originating from, who sent it, its length and format.

The 4 billion hours of phone calls, 1 million emails and 130 billion text messages that are expected to be prime source information.

The proposed bill, if passed would place massive amounts of personal data into the hands of the British government. How they use that data is purely at their discretion.

David Davis, senior Tory backbencher said: “It is not focusing on terrorists or on criminals. It is absolutely everybody. Our freedom and privacy has been protected by using the courts by saying ‘If you want to intercept, if you want to look at something, fine, if it is a terrorist or a criminal go and ask a magistrate and you’ll get your approval'”.

An average Briton’s private and daily habits would be open-source to potentially be used against them.

Internet companies will have to install hardware enabling GCHQ – the Government’s electronic “listening” agency – to examine “on demand” any phone call made, text message and email sent, and website accessed in “real time”.

“We’re really entering a whole new phase of analysis based on the data that we can collect,” said Gerald Kane, an information systems expert at Boston College. “There is quite a lot you can learn.”

Cell phone and service providers would be obliged to hand over customer data to the government.

Assessing location through communications gives the UK government access to information about their citizens that was previously unavailable.

Smartphones and social media can also be used to engage otherwise unknown material about whomever the authorities want to survey. All of this data is conveniently stored on most modern cell phones.

Ken Altshuler, of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers admitted that: “One name, one phone number that’s not on our client’s radar and our curiosity is piqued.” This data mining software allows previously unattainable evidence to be entered into court proceedings.

By analyzing your text messages, the government will know the sleeping habits of British citizens. “You can figure somebody’s sleep patterns, their weekly pattern of work,” said Tony Jebara, a Columbia University machine learning expert.

The information Jebara supposes has been an interest of credit card corporations for years.

By seeing when a call or text message is responded to can create a picture of how a person views others; including authority figures. Jebara, with Columbia colleges, created the term “automated social hierarchy detection” whereby they can determine who a person views other by how quickly they answer phone calls, text messages and emails.

Intelligence agencies could also use this information by creating flowcharts to understand their subject. Jebara remarked: “If you piece together the chain of influence, then you can find the central authority. You can figure that out without looking at the content.”

By using cell phone programs to determine the density of communication with specific persons, authorities can identify who are friends, family, acquaintances and classify them as such for further analysis.

The big brother style surveillance being prosed in Briton will expand authorities reach from social networking sites where users “volunteer information” to actual spying techniques where a constant flow of information is readily available.

By asserting that the UK government will implement safeguards to protect from abuse of power, they claim that the digital trails being left behind by people are shifting the rights to privacy, which legitimizes their use of that information against their own citizens.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media.



  1. GriffinWatch

    I feel sorry for our people working at G.C.H.Q., if they understood what the establishment were doing to our country/people, I'm sure that they would blow the whistle, so to speak. I live in hope.

  2. Anonymous

    The goverment are shitting it due to the fact that 70% of the population are NOT going out to vote for their perverted electoral system ! Just think what that 70% could do to collpase that perverted electoral system ?

  3. NickGrifford

    Time to learn how to speak in code. Before the internet is censored all Racial Nationalists (because we are all fighting for the same aims) need to get their fucking acts together. Hard times are coming…Regards,N.G.

  4. Anonymous

    Fuck 'em and their laws, there's far more of us than them!It's too late for the scaredycats now anyway, ever heard of retrospective?As they say, if you wouldn't say it on the streets don't say it on t'net!

  5. NickGrifford

    @Anon 20:29Far more able-bodied White Nationalists than the flunkies of the system? I would seriously doubt it. Start an insurrection and spend your most useful years behind bars under a tyrannical enemy regime? That is not my idea of overthrowing the establishment or securing the existence of our kind. Do that and we fail! Why don't you read up on Regulation 18B.If we are not fit for purpose then we cease to be. If we cannot out-manoeuvre our enemies (completely out-wit them by any means at our disposal) then we go extinct – the stakes are that high.Regards,N.G.

  6. NickGrifford

    I have just written this specifically for you, anon 20:29 – I haven't even edited it yet. explains what I believe we need to do to win. Not how we can win an election or the hearts and mind of the sheeple, actually WIN!Let me know if I speak with forked-tongue or with faecal breath.If it has its intended purpose, spread it around and make something happen. Remove my name if you want, it is meaningless anyway; what is important is the message. Don't debate me though because my opinion is granite, resolute and immovable. Regards,N.G.

  7. Anonymous

    NGFucking hell it sounds like it really IS the one-eyed cunt!You seem to have some notion that we will take our country back when the ranks of fit able bodied White nationalists will take to the streets, nah mate, we've moved on quite a bit since the 30's, it's all about quality over quantity now.Most of us are taking this seriously and are indeed the lillywhite sleepers of fascist wet-dreamers. Each individual is worth a hundred 'strong in't arm-thick in't head' types.Stick to wanking over your nazi books.

  8. Anonymous

    I've been browsing online greater than three hours as of late, but I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours. It is lovely value sufficient for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content material as you probably did, the web will probably be a lot more useful than ever before.My blog


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s