In an interview published in the Argentinean newspaper “LA NACION LINE,” on 6 December 2003, Mr Cortiglia, using the word ‘Malvinas’ to describe the Falklands, said in Spanish:
“Soy argentino oriental, o dicho de otro modo, uruguayo de nacimiento, y me siento muy ligado emocionalmente a la República Argentina. En 1982 me ofrecí como voluntario para ir a las Islas Malvinas. Todo nació de mi gran interés por la historia y por haber crecido nutrido por los ideales de lo que podría haber sido y finalmente no fue. Esto me llevó finalmente a involucrarme en la carrera periodística que, en definitiva, fue lo que me trajo al Reino Unido”. Así se presenta Carlos Cortiglia.”
This translates directly as:
“I am Argentine Eastern, or in other words, Uruguayan of birth, and I feel very bound emotionally to the Argentine Republic. In 1982 I offered myself as a volunteer to go to the Malvinas. Everything was born from my great interest by history and by to have grown nourished by the ideals than it could have been and finally it was not. This finally took to me to involve me in the journalistic race that, really, went what it brought to the United Kingdom “. This according to Carlos Cortiglia.”
establishmentwatch 
And this little gem has broke today ? Now consider this Obama backs Argentina's claim to take the islands back.This could get a bit messy considering there is an estimated 350 million of recoverable oil in the area and the Yanks love to go to war with anyone who has oil !A British company searching for oil off the Falkland Islands in the South Atlantic says it has made further significant finds. The company estimates there are 350m barrels of recoverable oil in the field it has been exploring – enough to turn the Falklands into a significant oil production centre.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-14925620
i am not a chauvinist patriot nor an imperialist, so i have no great hang-ups over the Falklands. I feel that if Argentina 'owned' the Channel isles or the isle of Wight [etc.] we would be up-in-arms. I feel similarly about Gibraltar, and felt the same over Hong Kong.Most of these were taken by force, sometimes using underhand methods, by the british State/ruling elite.They have no real bearing on me as a working class 'brit' whose British and Irish ancestors were shat upon by the same state/ruling elite.HOWEVER, because the BNP is a british nationalist group and campaigns on nationalism [not racialism] then it runs contrary to their proclaimed beliefs/ideals to stand a candidate who fought against Britain in a recent war.Summary: i dont give a monkey's tuppenny, but the BNP should.If this Uruguayan is of European descent and is a racialist/nationalist then I dont have a problem, but it shows that the BNP doesn't stand by its publicly avowed beliefs.Falklands ownership is more about oil rights than 'nationalism'.I would rather take-back birmingham than the falklands… ;-)i understand not all patriots in the uk will agree, but i'm not advocating being pro-poof or pro-israel so before anyone rants, just take a deep breath.
The answer is both.
The Falklands are British the people are British they want to stay British!
Third Positionist you are a total prat. You should join the English Dummies you'll feel at home with them.Dick Head
anon at 15 September 2011 18:15 saidThe Falklands are British the people are British they want to stay British!Please make sure you and yours go down there when the fighting kicks off again and fight and die and get horribly maimed for them. These are banker's conflicts for their profits and power. Britain is £1 Trillion in national debt so a fat lot of fucking good the last conflict did us as we sink under debt and mass immigration brought upon us by the same bankers who engineered the Falkland's War. Is London, Luton, Bradford, Birmingham etc, now also owned by the occupiers and rightfully theirs? You people who bang on about about British establishment/banker (not the people) occupied territories like the Malvinas 1000's of miles away and even on the other side of the Earth in the case of the Malvinas, and clearly Argentinian being off the coast of Argentina, don't seem very Nationalist to me. How would you feel about the Argentinians setting up shop on the Outer Hebrides and pinching what's not rightfully theirs? A tad upset I would imagine.
Many London BNP activists are not campaigning for Carlos, they are fed up with Griffin imposing a candidate on them. They are saying that the White London electorate will not for a man like Carlos, we will be made a laughing stock during next May's election.
As someone who has already seen the cost of his electricity and gas go up twice since Christmas by a total of nearly 40% i would like to point out to those people on this forum who don't value the British ownership of the FALKLAND Islands that its possession might just make the difference between freezing to death and being able to live a reasonable life for the British people over the next few decades.If you can't see the value of this oil now then rest assured that you will when we have none that we can afford,when you are sitting in your home in 2020 and can see the cloud left by your breath,when your unable cook your food because you can't afford to use the gas then i think it not unlikely that you will have changed your views on the value of the Falklands but sadly by then it will no longer matter what you think as an oil rich Argentina will have set up a ring of steel to defend the islands that will keep them alive for the next century.Without oil and gas we are going to die a slow and lingering death,if that is what turns you on be my guest but don't be upset if i try to avoid that little party!
There is a common misconception that the Argentinian ever had a prescence on the Falklands, in fact just because on a map these Islands are seemingly a stone throws away from the Argentinian coast it does not mean that they are automatically up for argument.Third Positionist makes reference to oil, bollocks, he's just using a marxist con, as oil/mineral exploration has never been the issue, (the huge cost involved in the current oil exploration confirms this fact).The Falklands are a Crown Possession in much the same way as Jersey, Guernsey, Alderney, Sark, Gibraltar et al are.It is not 'imperialism' to lay claim to a previously uninhabited land mass, colonise with people from ones own racial stock. Fuck the BNP. The Falklands are not Malvinas, they have always been the FALKLANDS NEVER Malvinas.The 'Falklands question' also only arises in direct proportion to the strife the current Argentinian corrupt government are in.Patagonia on the otherhand are WELSH so let's send a BEF over there to get shot of the Argentinian interlopers!
anon at 21:29 please go and do something to yourself that is sexually fucking impossible. "The Falklands are a Crown Possession in much the same way as Jersey, Guernsey, Alderney, Sark, Gibraltar et al are."And screw the Crown too while you are screwing yourself. The Crown Bitch is responsible as Commander in Chief for our troops coming home in sealed coffins or no arms and legs or bollocks because of Her Maj's banker chum's illegal wars. Do you seriously think Britain would have gone to war in the 80's over just a few seriously inbred fucking amongst themselves Falkland Islanders? Stupid Boy.
FAO: 21.39What the fuck are you doing on here? You must be that 'Third Positionist' retard, or at least you must be a fellow Church of the Child Molestor congregant of his.Wherever there is a British subject then there is protection from the British State, you on the other hand are a typical fenian bastard who takes what he wants from the 'evil butcher' listen cunt, the famine is over now fuck off home!
Too true screw the crown they have aquired a plot under Denver Airport with the rest of the world illuminati (go and google Obama,Denver airport 27/9/2011) ! These bastards think they can escape whats coming round about the 27th of September ! Strange things will start happening and these freaks that have enslaved us are now shitting it as its coming after them.Is it the end of time or the start of mankinds perfect destiny to live in peace ? God only knows but go check things out because if you havent yet noticed the change in the earths magnetic field in the last week is telling us all the signs.
So what's occuring on the 27th? Pray do tell 'cos we've got Watford away that evening so unsure whether I should book the train tickets now to get my early bird discount.The Monarchy is the best means England, Wales, Scotland independently and withing the Union has and have had. Unfortunately it is corrupt officials/advisors (a la Jud Suss) which has turned the Crown against its people.
FAO: Retard at 23:45 I would hate to be as dumb as you. Galtieri was given the virtual green light from our 'Foreign Office' to invade/reacquire the Malvinas/Falklands and he was daft enough to take the bait or he was a highly rewarded part of the deception. Wars are nice little earners for bankers who usually fund both/all sides in the conflict and who loan the money at national debt enslaving interest to cash strapped and bankrupt governments.Each Tomahawk Cruise Missile (for example) fired during the recent NATO/West's/Banker's rape of Libya cost £350,000 which the government will have had to have borrowed at interest. The cost of the conflict to both/all sides will have likely run into £Billions probably. Not bad going for the UK which is £1 Trillion in national debt to the same bankers.UK Debt Clock http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/debtclock/press.html Only the bankers ever benefit from these usually engineered conflicts by increasing the participating country's national debt and furthering the banker's stranglehold over them.1815: Nathan Mayer Rothschild makes his famous statement, "I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply."1849: Gutle Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife dies. Before her death she would nonchalantly state,"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none."They are also useful to struggling PM's like Thatcher who can then call a General Election off the back of the certain military victory and ensure a near certain General Election victory. I'm not interested in this Carlos Cortiglia chap who has clearly been chosen by the state handled BNP to rub nationalist noses in the proverbial.
A very knowledgable comment.Education is the key, well said.
Ooh lots of upset British Statists as i thought.I made my stance clear at the start.We have no right to the Falklands. The British state chose to put people out there.The British state only ever does these things for Trade, military bases and natural resources.I do not know if Argentina has a sealed right to the Falklands, and I know those who play from the MI6 song-sheet will quote the "right" of ancient accords signed to give the Falklands to Britain: but I do know that the idea that the "Falklands is British" is tosh.if South Americans were laying claim to Islands off our coast or in our sphere of influence the same State-worshippers and 19th Century imperial fantasists would be foaming at the mouth.really.Get a life.You have things like immigration, usury and the pink mafia to worry about.An archipeligo many, many thousands of miles away is hardly the kind of bed-wetting stuff that so many "anons" [including Mr. Richard Head] are getting so wound up about.Move on. Whatever next? "take back Hong Kong! Start up the Opium trade!" Come on.p.s. this is only my 2nd post on this subject. I have no idea who those other[s] are posting on a similar line. But they make some sound points.
Third Positionist, you are a total prat.PISS OFF WANKER!!!
GriffinWatch at 12:54Thanks GW. Here is some more info for the readers to digest and to hopefully understand where all these banker engineered wars and conflicts – usually started on a false flag incident – actually originate from:1914: The start of World War I. In this war, the German Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to the British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French.Futhermore, the Rothschilds have control of the three European news agencies, Wolff (est. 1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851) in England, and Havas (est. 1835) in France.The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely reported in the media, because they own the media.
Just another opportunity for griffstein to shaft nationalism for his masters.By the way why does Griffin think he's not going on trial for treason when our day comes ?
Rothschild did indeed declare that he cared nought who was on the Throne as he controlled the money supply, this would also be a truism if Britain had a Presidency.It is not the system of monarchy which is to blame but the fact that the dastardly jew financiers have been given leave to practice their illicit and immoral business here….and that was thanks to Cromwell who indeed did execute Charles on behalf of his jew backers. Put that in your pipe and smoke it Turd Positionist.
Re anon at 21:29 and "The Falklands are a Crown Possession"I think your unfortunate and incorrect use of the word "Possession" instead of Protectorate which is what I think you actually meant, could be classed as a Freudian Slip. What You Didn't Know About Taxes & The 'Crown' There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy [estimated at £150 Billion which pales in comparison to the House of Rothschild's £500 Trillion or half the planet's worth] the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state known as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'The City is NOT a part of England, just as Washington is not a part of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually. When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/taxesandcrown.html As long as we have this archaic, mediaeval and tyrannical set-up misruling over us, those who support and defend it (like you) will be a SUBJECT and SLAVE and those who reject and oppose it (like me) will be a CITIZEN and FREEMAN.
Anon at 21:09 and "It is not the system of monarchy which is to blame"The monarchy is an integral part of the problem. It never ceases to amaze me how any nationalist can support it because no nationalist administration will ever be tolerated by the House of Windsor-SAXE-COBURG-GOTHA.Quote:-The name was SAXE-COBURG-GOTHA for the Queen's side of the family and SHLESWEIG-HOLSTEIN-SONDERBURG-GLUCKSBURG and BATTENBERG for Philip's side. The names were changed during WORLD WAR I right after London was bombed by 24 twin-engined GOTHA war planes.A LONG read but well worth it:This article appears in the August 7, 2009 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.LAROUCHE WEBCASTThe Fall of the House of Windsor http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2009/webcasts/3630august1_opener.html So, we're dealing with a President, who is committed deliberately to a policy of genocide! And if you look at the way Hitler's policy of genocide proceeded, from September, especially from Oct. 1, of that year, until the end, till the end of him, you see that Obama and his friends in London — because he's run from London, not from United States; he's run by the British monarchy, not by the voters of the United States — are moving exactly in that direction. If you don't stop Obama's health-care policy now, you will not have a United States. You will have something worse than Hitler produced, because it will be on a global scale, not limited to some part of the planet.
Further to my 21:55 I should add that I don't agree with or accept Lyndon LaRouche's historically incorrect use of the Hitler analogy when infinitely more (100+ million mainly Christian by some accounts) were actually massacred by the Jewish Bolsheviks and Communists, but of course no one knows about this as it has been conveniently buried and erased from history. I think he uses the Hitler reference because that's what people know or think they know. What is history [taught in schools and Made in Hollywood] after all but a fable agreed upon? The Art of David Deeshttp://www.rense.com/1.mpicons/deesA1.htm
Carlos Cortiglia is reportedly to be of "Italian Parentage".Not another "Italian Job"…"I only said blow the bloody Station up"
My views and loyalties to England and English nationalism are well known and are in no doubt. I firmly believe in meritocracy not monarchy; I'm an out-and-out republican who detests notions that an accident of birth raises a person above the law, bestowes upon them previledges and expensive lifestyles funded by working people, pays minimum taxes (if any at all) and lords it over the working classes. Regardless who owns the Falklands and the surrounding oil fields thereabouts (and the Argentian's claim is a strong one), the English people will not benefit from the oil extracted because it will be controlled by the Rothschilds and the Kosher Nostrils so English people will still see their breath and die miserably of of hyperthermia in the winter.As for the poster's comments on the Queen's treachery and related contentious issues, he/she is absolutely correct and can't logically be faulted – blind loyalty to a self-serving self-enriching crowned German jew cuckoo in the English nest is one of the main reasons for England being deep in shit on all accounts ranging from uncontrolled mass-immigration to over-taxation.I've no time for Brown-Hatter Harrington but if it is he who is the author of the above series of logical argument he is not articulation anything other staunch English nationalists have not already written and said openly – we can't logically defend English nationalism if we can't accept the rights of foreigners to defend their nationalism by logical argument.Peace among nationalists and fuck the jews. Fly On The Wall
Fly on the wall – you speak much sense. No doubt the monosyllabic Sun editorial moron will soon be on top throw a few cuss words at you.Thanks for raising the debate and bringing common sense and intelligence to a much needed debate.- no, I am not Harrington. I quite the NF over his pro-queer outbursts in the media.
Third Positionist said… – no, I am not Harrington. I quite the NF over his pro-queer outbursts in the media.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Wheeeeew – TP – relieved to know that – don't want anyone getting the wrong idea that I'm a Brown-Hatter Harrington fan, but logic is logic and facts are facts and both should be studied and analysed with an open mind so as to formulate plans for saving England, the indigenous English and their culture without compromising English nationalism – using that formula clever people are, as I type, working on that very problem – and Gri££in Watch and Northwest Nationalists will be the first to publish the news when it comes together.Remember, the jews and jew/MI5 cock-puppet saboteurs such as Gri££in are our real enemies.Peace, harmony and best regards to all nationalists,Fly On The Wall
So who has 'just claim' to NZ and Australia if we are to follow TP 'logic'…..the Japs/Chinese/Indonesians….The little point that these yellow skinned slanty eyes never ever set foot on the land mass is also a 'minor detail' is it not?
So who has 'just claim' to NZ and Australia if we are to follow TP 'logic'…..the Japs/Chinese/Indonesians….~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Surely the first race inhabiting a country has prior rights to that country until it voluntarily fully abandons that country without coersion or trickery – meaning the Abos have first claim to Australia and the Moaris New Zealand – that other cuckoo races stole their countries (most times by murdering the First Race – sometimes by tricking them) and have settled there for one or more centuries doesn't give the cuckoo race(s) moral ownership, only ownership based on violence and murder camouflaged with rules (laws) concocted by the invading race(s) – just like the fucking parasitical jew cuckoos have doing to indigenous English people since the moron Oliver Cromwell let that destructive cancerous race back into Britain so as to fund his wars.Fly On The Wall
Fly on the Wall,You are saying many things I believe.There is a problem however over some areas in the world the Falklands being one of them also the "Cape". For instance Europeans have settled and developed both these areas, to my knowledge the Zulus invaded the Eastern Cape and therefore their claim is illigitimate and as sush the "Boers" have preferential rights.Also likewise the British Falklanders have developed these islands.Once we are rid of Satan's seeds influence then a new nationalist perspective of past problems created by these monsters can help devise new solutions. You are correct we need to work in harmony with all TRUE nationalists.Its worth noting here the people of Ulster have the right to remain within the family of British nations and the IRA are not nationalists.Whiteboar
Whiteboar, my regards – sovereignty and nationalism are usually complex and confusing issues often causing dilemmas and confliction among staunch nationalists – especially when it comes to Irish politics and the Falklands – and I'll give you my line of thinking on both.Simplified, the Irish problem was created by a Catholic king, Henry VIII, who screwed the arse off every female within leaping distance and formed his own brand of christianity when the pope refused him papal dispensation to divorce his wife and marry his latest favourite leg-over, and imported mainly Scots into Ireland to ruthlessly put down Irish catholics revolting against him for breaking away from the Church of Rome – result – high velocity protestant shit hits unstoppable Catholic fan – by the way, Whiteboar, I've been an atheist since my pre-school days and have no time for any religion.The Irish should be left to resolve their own political problems without outside interference – Irish politics is not worth a single drop of English blood because all attempts at stopping reunification have been, and still are, doomed to failure due to the undeniable fact that Northern Irish catholics are out-breeding Northern Irish protestants and will soon have the political majority for voting for reunification – when Thatcher's close advisers told her this demoraphic reality of N.I. she had hysterics and was mentally crushed for months after.Irish politics is a red herring distracting English nationalists from addressing and solving dire English problems – Gri££in knew that and often used that red herring for diverting and derailing English nationalism from its own course.Another fact: in nearly every instance, partioned countries fight and scheme for reunification – the USA spent hundreds-of-billions of dollars, dropped over 2.5 millions-of-tons of bombs and killed hundreds-of-thousands of vietnames to stop the reunification of Vietnam – and lost to people small of stature, wearing cut-out lorry tire sandals (Ho Chi Minh thousand-milers), and pushing bikes loaded with weaponry and ammunition of all kinds; then there's north and south Korea – given time they will reunite; then there's the annexation of Kosova – which will blow up again when Serb nationalists get round to booting out their own traitors bent on joining the EU; east and west Germany – united. conti ……
Conti …..The Falklands Islands: many countries could claim first discovery – and on that basis claim ownership of the Falkland islands. When England first `discovered' the FIs they stayed a while then abandoned them, leaving behind a plaque claiming the FIs as British – the Agentinians then settled on the inhabited FIs before the English returned and booted the new settlers off. Weighing up the situation dispassionately it's not hard concluding Argentina has a better legal claim to the FIs than Britain but I opine an equitable and just settlement would be for Britain and Argentina to share the FI's resources.South Africa – Boers: It' true when white people/boers settled in S. Africa that part of Africa was uninhabited by zulus but as Africans the country is their's – because an indigenous people of a country haven't populated or exploited every square mile of their native country doesn't mean that country isn't their's – put it this way – if a bunch of niggers rowed across the english channel and became troglodytic on sheer rock-faced cliffs overlooking the sea and discovered diaminds thereon and began diamond mining, or, settled in some remote uninhabited Scottish valley and discovered gold and began gold mining, would you be willing to allow those wogs to remain in Britain and plunder Britain's mineral resources or would you give them the bum's rush out of Britain ?If we are to argue for halting and reversing immigration into Britain I opine we need to be logically consistant – and if another country produces the likes of the IRA, whether nationalist, marxist or capitalist, let's not make it our concern or waste effort, money or precious lives of the English people, on that country.Regards,Fly On The Wall
As long as individuals are prepared to work for a white European civilisation and future they should be welcome in our movement.Division is planted by our emnemies to distract us and our energy.Their Eurocide is succeeding, yet we have only about 12,000 in our movement?
The error our forefather settlers made was to not persue a policy of wiping the mud inhabitants off the face of the earth!
The error our forefather settlers made was to not persue a policy of wiping the mud inhabitants off the face of the earth!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A lost opportunity, I agree – but we must now organise and concentrate on getting niggers of all shades and jew slavers out of Britain and slamming the door shut permenently.Fly On The Wall
"Its worth noting here the people of Ulster have the right to remain within the family".Hmmm.Just because the IRA is not nationalist [in its leadership] does not negate Irish nationalism, any more than griffin's pro-jewish warblings and corruption have negated British nationalism to its adherents.Ulster used to be the most Nationalist region of Ireland until Stuart times and the plantation.I'm not suggesting any answers, but narrow jingoism can sometimes blind us to the fact that the Irish are our White cousins.Why waste blood and effort fighting them?Just a suggestion.
Indeed, sectarianism in this case is Establishment fostered divide and conquer amongst our white brethren and should stop henceforth.
Gri££in Watch, I'd be more than happy for the Northern and Southern Irish to unite and help us to halt and reverse wog immigration to white lands, however, both sides have been at each other's throats for so long and are so dangerous, that, even now, an innocent political comment or a misunderstood glance, can still get one killed, so I think it wise to stay well clear to let both sides come to a permenent honourable accommodation while English nationalists try dealing with our immediate national problems – and if we get `outside' help, then the better for us.Fly On The Wall
Cortiglia or Hohestaufen? Mmmm…. We found a certain Luis Alberto Coronel Hohestaufen (Ludwig Albert)on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/#!/luisacoronelhohestaufenDoes the name Karl Gerhard Hohestaufen sound familiar? It should. Italian? Mmmm….
[url=http://www.freewebs.com/buyamitriptyline/sydney-order-amitriptyline]purchase amitriptyline uk[/url]Sydney purchase amitriptyline 10 mg onlineSydney buy endep 50 mg onlineorder amitriptyline 50 mg Melbournebuy amitriptyline 10 mgorder endep 10 mg Melbourne
[url=http://www.microgiving.com/profile/clarithromycin]biaxin xl buy[/url]