B.B.C. Smear job on the B.N.P. in the offing?

“Something happened to me on Thursday last which confirms beyond any shadow of a doubt that an outside production company is engaged in the making of a documentary intended to be shown on BBC television, possibly just before the election period, and most likely under the “Panorama” banner.

Please do not ask me about this or send private messages inquiring after what is going on. I am not so trusting as to respond to them.

It should be enough for all Nationalists to know that the BBC is a relentlessly hostile organisation, and that any documentary aired by them will be in the nature of a “hatchet job”.

I am aware that a number of “nationalists” are co-operating with the production company, led on by the unspoken promise and in the expectation that the thrust of the documentary will be against Nicholas Griffin.

I am also aware (or, rather have been told by a very well informed and long trusted source) that part of the reason for the sudden lifting of certain suspensions is that HQ is very much aware that this documentary is being made, and in that light feel it necessary to extend an olive branch towards alienated members who may be tempted to co-operate in the making of it.

A number of BNP and former BNP members are co-operating in the belief that the documentary will be the end of Nicholas Griffin, and a vague belief that he will go to prison as a consequence of it.

This is deeply misguided. God knows, I have more cause than most to loathe the very air Nicholas Griffin breathes and will be the first to drink to his demise. But not this way.

The BBC is hostile to nationalism, not simply that part of it represented by the BNP. To co-operate is to co-operate with an inveterate enemy. It may well be that this documentary shall see Nicholas Griffin off, but those who believe that the ends justify the means and that in the future their co-operation will result in some sort of “fairness” towards British Nationalism on the part of the BBC are woefully mistaken. The BBC will one day come for you in exactly the same underhanded manner they come for the BNP.

It is my contention that any person co-operating in the making of this documentary is a fool for allowing his and her desire for revenge to be manipulated in the purpose of the BBC’s anti-nationalist agenda, and, further, that such persons be excluded forever from the ranks of our movement.

What goes on in the BNP is our business, and though our very real differences have regrettably been disputed in the public gaze on forums such as this, how those differences are to be resolved remains our business. To extend any co-operation at all to an organisation staffed by liberals and left wingers bent on our destruction by taking advantage of those differences is an act of unconscionable treachery, one that may so well explode our movement that we shall be a decade or more in rebuilding even to our current shrunken and divided condition.

Nicholas Griffin must go, as we all know, but in putting him out we must not also put out the very flame of the cause for which we have so long struggled.”

More on the subject here:
Advertisements

5 thoughts on “B.B.C. Smear job on the B.N.P. in the offing?

  1. Anonymous

    This will be very interesting i just wonder if some of the people who joined the BNP that we had our doubts about that just packed up and vanished will pop up on this documentary ? No matter how much i and many people hate griffin for leading the party into a non returnable abyss you do not go singing to the enemey,the man might be an ass but you never grass especially to the BBC.Anyway this makes interesting reading about certain people that had never been nationalists in their lives but SUDDENLY joined the BNP.• Did he turn up out of nowhere, and get on famously with members of the group within hours of joining?• Does his wife/girlfriend, whom he talked about at the first few meetings, suddenly vanish from his conversation?• Does he disappear for long periods, claiming he's visiting relatives or going to an east European pop festival you've never heard of before?• Does he tap into, and encourage paranoia?• Does he agree with you in anything you say, but try to control your actions by quoting unsubstantiated opinions of those who are higher in the hierarchy?• Does he claim organisations like Searchlight or UAF are more effective, mighty, organised, or scary than they actually are? Police are unlikely to namedrop Searchlight, but Searchlight trolls will not be able to resist to 'big themselves up' .• Is he a bit of a puzzle: he's terribly keen on your campaign, but you cannot quite explain why he's involved?• Does he – on the other hand – over-enthuse about your campaign, urging the group on to ever more daring escapades?• Does he ever accuse other people in your group/movement of being agents (to divert attention)?• Does he appear to be excessively helpful – offering to ferry people to protests, take them home afterwards?• Does he have a car – or a van – which he offers to make available to the group for transport to and from meetings/demos?• Does he volunteer for tedious tasks which, while doing the rest of you a favour, allow him access to data, such as membership lists?• Does he appear to be oddly well-off, buying rounds in the pub, but never giving any indication of where he works or how he earns a living? (Pc Kennedy was known as 'Flash' for his generosity.)• Is he real quiet but always looks as if they are about to pounce, ie never exhausted or relaxed?• Does he ask for a receipt at the bar when he thinks no one's looking?• Does he urge the group to be violent or break the law but – oddly – not show up on the day for which the activity has been planned?• Is he more intelligent than the average group member, or from a different background to most members? People usually hang out with people from the same background.• Is he fiddling with his mobile when the rest of you have yours turned off for an important meeting?• Are you suddenly aware that there is more dissent within the group than before, more disruption?• Are things suddenly going pear-shaped when they always went pretty smoothly before?• Does he spread rumours about, and slag off prominent nationalists?

    Reply
  2. Anonymous

    This will be very interesting i just wonder if some of the people who joined the BNP that we had our doubts about that just packed up and vanished will pop up on this documentary.This would be around 2006/2007 where people were popping up from one end of the country and joining a branch in the other end of the country where they had supposedly moved to but were always going home for long periods of time ?

    Reply
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous said… Anyway this makes interesting reading about certain people that had never been nationalists ……• Did he turn up out of nowhere, and get on famously with members of the group within hours of joining?• Does his wife/girlfriend, whom he talked about at the first few meetings, suddenly vanish from his conversation?• Does he disappear for long periods, claiming he's visiting relatives or going to an east European pop festival you've never heard of before?• Does he tap into, and encourage paranoia?• Does he agree with you in anything you say, but try to control your actions by quoting unsubstantiated opinions of those who are higher in the hierarchy?• Does he claim organisations like Searchlight or UAF are more effective, mighty, organised, or scary than they actually are? Police are unlikely to namedrop Searchlight, but Searchlight trolls will not be able to resist to 'big themselves up' .• Is he a bit of a puzzle: he's terribly keen on your campaign, but you cannot quite explain why he's involved?• Does he – on the other hand – over-enthuse about your campaign, urging the group on to ever more daring escapades?• Does he ever accuse other people in your group/movement of being agents (to divert attention)?• Does he appear to be excessively helpful – offering to ferry people to protests, take them home afterwards?• Does he have a car – or a van – which he offers to make available to the group for transport to and from meetings/demos?• Does he volunteer for tedious tasks which, while doing the rest of you a favour, allow him access to data, such as membership lists?• Does he appear to be oddly well-off, buying rounds in the pub, but never giving any indication of where he works or how he earns a living? (Pc Kennedy was known as 'Flash' for his generosity.)• Is he real quiet but always looks as if they are about to pounce, ie never exhausted or relaxed?• Does he ask for a receipt at the bar when he thinks no one's looking?• Does he urge the group to be violent or break the law but – oddly – not show up on the day for which the activity has been planned?• Is he more intelligent than the average group member, or from a different background to most members? People usually hang out with people from the same background.• Is he fiddling with his mobile when the rest of you have yours turned off for an important meeting?• Are you suddenly aware that there is more dissent within the group than before, more disruption?• Are things suddenly going pear-shaped when they always went pretty smoothly before?• Does he spread rumours about, and slag off prominent nationalists?25 January 2011 20:07~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Most or all of the above traitors' modus operandi are perfect hallmarks of those treacherous bastards Gri££in, 5IMon Darby, Lecomber, and Kemp.Gri££in Watch, in the matter of internal nationalist problems I totally agree with your sentiments of not assisting any establishment bodies such as MSM and the police. We'll wash the treacherous filthy shit and scum out of the nationalist movement by ourselves, without the help of BBC or any one else outside nationalist circles.Gri££in Watch, good luck and keep up the good work.Fly On The Wall

    Reply
  4. GriffinWatch

    Those words aren't mine, it's a quote from someone on the BDF although we largely agree with them here.Ultimately those organisations such as the B.B.C. may use some of the info. that we put out here on G.W. (we know that the B.B.C. visit the blog), unfortunately this is unavoidable, we most certainly wouldn't have anything to do with them, should they be stupid enough to approach us.You are of course correct, we need to/need to be seen to be "taking out our own trash", ie Griffarage and his cronies. Nationalism has the moral highground, ideologically speaking, by helping to remove Griffarage et al, we are already proving that. When Griffarage is finally removed, as he will be, we can say that it is us, as a Nationalist collective, that had him removed, not the odious government controlled BBC or the nefarious EHRC.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s