Online lies and defamation exposed. UPDATED.


We can confirm that the above poster on the British Democracy Forum is not in fact Sean Hadley as pictured.

 

1 Responsibility for publication

(1) In defamation proceedings a person has a defence if he shows that—
(a) he was not the author, editor or publisher of the statement complained of,
(b) he took reasonable care in relation to its publication, and
(c) he did not know, and had no reason to believe, that what he did caused or contributed to the publication of a defamatory statement.
(2) For this purpose “author”, “editor” and “publisher” have the following meanings, which are further explained in subsection (3)—
  • “author” means the originator of the statement, but does not include a person who did not intend that his statement be published at all;
  • “editor” means a person having editorial or equivalent responsibility for the content of the statement or the decision to publish it; and
  • “publisher” means a commercial publisher, that is, a person whose business is issuing material to the public, or a section of the public, who issues material containing the statement in the course of that business.
(3) A person shall not be considered the author, editor or publisher of a statement if he is only involved—
(a) in printing, producing, distributing or selling printed material containing the statement;
(b) in processing, making copies of, distributing, exhibiting or selling a film or sound recording (as defined in Part I of the [1988 c. 48.] Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988) containing the statement;
(c) in processing, making copies of, distributing or selling any electronic medium in or on which the statement is recorded, or in operating or providing any equipment, system or service by means of which the statement is retrieved, copied, distributed or made available in electronic form;
(d) as the broadcaster of a live programme containing the statement in circumstances in which he has no effective control over the maker of the statement;
(e) as the operator of or provider of access to a communications system by means of which the statement is transmitted, or made available, by a person over whom he has no effective control.
In a case not within paragraphs (a) to (e) the court may have regard to those provisions by way of analogy in deciding whether a person is to be considered the author, editor or publisher of a statement.
(4) Employees or agents of an author, editor or publisher are in the same position as their employer or principal to the extent that they are responsible for the content of the statement or the decision to publish it.
(5) In determining for the purposes of this section whether a person took reasonable care, or had reason to believe that what he did caused or contributed to the publication of a defamatory statement, regard shall be had to—
(a) the extent of his responsibility for the content of the statement or the decision to publish it,
(b) the nature or circumstances of the publication, and
(c) the previous conduct or character of the author, editor or publisher.
(6) This section does not apply to any cause of action which arose before the section came into force.”
We here at G.W. don’t think for a minute that an honourable intelligent man such as Adrian will fall for this blatant attempt at troublecausing, we are just making a point with this post.  

UPDATED:

Well done to the B.D.F. for removing these blatant and nefarious attempted smears. Other blogs attempting to smear good nationalists names will also dealt with accordingly in the non to distant future. 😉 

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Online lies and defamation exposed. UPDATED.

  1. Anonymous

    It is becoming a very sad state of affairs from the infiltrators.Griffin is making himself look like a complete fool with all these buffoons around him the party has now been long time state and griffins ilks are really showing a bad show here.Take it back folks.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous

    Utter scumbags for trying to smear you, this is the type of thing one would expect from Golding & Jefferson while their one -eyed master is away on his holidays? GW keep up the sterling work.

    Reply
  3. Anonymous

    Tonight's Salisbury meeting scuppered, I've just seen this posted."It is with a heavy heart that I write this post, and it is a reflection upon the democratic principles of Mr Griffin and his cohorts.The venue owners where the meeting was to be held in Salisbury this evening have cancelled at lunchtime today, as someone – and we have a good idea of the one or two names it could be from the Griffin cabal – has emailed them to advise them that we are holding a BNP meeting.I have appealed and argued that this is a private meeting, set up and paid for by myself, and is not a BNP meeting, although it is a meeting about the British National Party. My appeals have been to no avail, and the venue owners have refused our attendance.Please would you circulate this news as widely as possible, as I am unable, in this short notice, to advise those who may be attending. May I apologise to those members who may have a wasted journey this evening, but this happening is not any fault of mine or anyone who was going to speak at the meetings.The blame lies purely at the feet of Griffin and his thugs, and if this is Griffin’s idea of democracy it really is little wonder why he is hated by the general public, and disliked by members. Those same members who are bleeding, crying and gasping for the first breaths of winds of change to sweep over this bankrupted Party."

    Reply
  4. Nemesis

    That's the spirit lad.Opponents of Griffarage, led by groups like Griffin Watch amongst others, lead by example and set the store through their own high standards.Also, intelligent work will also defeat Griffinism.Griffin and his toadies are up against the ropes now – and they know it.

    Reply
  5. Anonymous

    Looks like you're hurting them, Sean. You must be hitting a nerve.Its only when you start getting close ? Ive had the same treatment as Sean including death threats the reds inside the BNP know their being sussed out by true nationalists who have been outed. Where is Lance Stewart in all this ? The writings now on the wall in every region,this is not coincidence they are going for mass attack to break the party up and there is no better time with eddy's leadership challenge,griffins cock ups,darbys resignation as deputy chairman,dowson's scamming begging letters/emails etc think about it.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous

    'Where is Lance Stewart in all this'We keep hearing the name Lance Stewart but has anybody actually met him or knows what he looks like and yes what is he doing?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s